• Est. 2015 in Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Enroll Now

Flea Booties, Horse Debts, and the Pondertorium: Exploring Aristophanes’ The Clouds (Ad Navseam Ep. 208)

Meta Description: Join Dr. Jeff Winkle and Dr. David Noe in Ad Navseam Episode 208 as they explore Aristophanes’ The Clouds. Discover the absurdity of the Pondertorium, the debate over Socrates’ caricature, the “win some, luge some” pun, and ways to master the Latin language

Introduction: The Polar Vortex and Working Blue

Welcome back, classical gourmands, to Episode 208 of the Ad Navseam Podcast! Broadcasting from the freezing depths of Parnassus Central, your hosts, Dr. Jeff Winkle and Dr. David Noe, are battling the harsh elements of a brutal Michigan winter.

Jeff recounts his epic, freezing trek to the bunker, joking that he encountered the “Abdominal Snowman” around every corner. He laments the sheer physical agony of pumping gas without gloves in a polar vortex, noting the Sisyphean struggle of filling a tank when the freezing temperatures shrink the fuel’s volume. To pass the chilly time, the hosts briefly discuss the Winter Olympics. Dave notoriously refers to the winter games as a complete “snoozefest,” strongly preferring the summer track and field events. Jeff agrees that the ancient Greeks would likely share this sentiment, as winter sports utterly lack the combative, warrior ideal found in the ancient pankration—though Dave proudly unleashes a carefully prepared pun, declaring that in life, “you win some, you luge some”.

Moving to the main topic, Jeff notes it has been a very long time since the podcast covered the ancient Greek playwright Aristophanes. Dave explains his hesitance: he prefers not to “work blue”. While he objects completely to profanity—which he defines as taking something sacred and treating it as worthless—he also tries to avoid outright obscenity, finding the constant stream of lowbrow, sexual, and barnyard humor somewhat uncomfortable for a family program. However, both hosts ultimately concede that Aristophanes is an absolute master at mixing extremely low toilet humor with exceptionally high, biting insights into human nature.

The World of Aristophanes: A Mad Imagination

To set the academic stage, Jeff reads from a 1988 article by Raymond K. Fisher in the Journal of Greece and Rome, which attempts to find the modern relevance of Aristophanes’ comedy. Despite the article attempting to connect ancient Greece to the 1980s era of leg warmers, Run-DMC, and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, the core question remains: how do we relate to a comic poet whose jokes were so hyper-localized to his specific time?

Aristophanes lived during the late fifth century BC, writing through the Golden Age of Athens and the devastating Peloponnesian War. Out of dozens of plays, only eleven survive today. For this episode, the hosts utilize Peter Meinick’s masterful translation published by Hackett.

In his excellent introduction, Meinick warns modern readers not to expect a standard “comedy of errors” or a sitcom-style plot. (Dave takes a brief detour here to complain that his friend Joseph permanently ruined the “comedy of errors” genre for him by pointing out how lazy and absurd mistaken identity plots actually are). Instead, Meinick compares Aristophanic comedy to a wild combination of the slapstick of the Three Stooges, the musical numbers of Broadway, the political satire of Doonesbury, and the sheer fantasy of J.R.R. Tolkien wrapped up in a Monty Python sketch. Jeff simply compares the playwright’s crude but sharply perceptive style to the modern animated series South Park.

Socrates in the Crosshairs: Three Interpretations

One of the most striking elements of The Clouds is that it features the famous philosopher Socrates as a central, highly mocked character. Because Aristophanes personally knew Socrates and ran in the same circles, scholars have fiercely debated the playwright’s actual intentions. Meinick lays out three main interpretive theories:

  1. Malice and Hostility: Aristophanes was a strict traditionalist who genuinely hated Socrates, viewing him as a dangerous threat who brought new, corrupting ideas to the city.
  2. Pure Comedy and Homage: Aristophanes respected Socrates, and the extreme caricature was simply an act of “willful distortion and exaggeration” meant as a loving, ribs-poking homage among peers.
  3. Us vs. Them: Aristophanes simply did not care about the nuance between true philosophy and sophistry; he just used Socrates as a weird, abnormal target to get cheap laughs from the average citizen.

Both Dave and Jeff firmly agree with the second interpretation, finding that it gives Aristophanes the most credit for his immense artistic skill without assuming deep-seated malice.

The Plot: Horse Debts and the Ponderatorium

Dave shifts gears and begins reciting the opening lines of The Clouds in beautifully metered ancient Greek iambic trimeter.

The play opens with an older, crotchety man named Strepsiades (a name meaning “the twisting, turning guy”) tossing and turning in his bed. He is completely crippled by anxiety over his massive, mounting financial debts. The source of this debt is his son, Pheidippides, who is hopelessly addicted to horse racing and gambling. As Strepsiades angrily reviews his ledger, he notes a staggering debt of 1,200 drachmas (roughly equivalent to three years’ wages) owed for a single horse, while his son peacefully sleep-talks about chariot lanes in the adjacent bed.

Strepsiades bitterly regrets his marriage. He was a simple, thrifty country boy who loved the smell of shaggy sheep and bees, but he married an elite city aristocrat (the niece of the famous Megacles). Their class clash culminated in the naming of their son. The wife demanded a high-class, horsey name containing the root word hippos, while Strepsiades wanted to name him after his thrifty grandfather. They compromised on Pheidippides, essentially meaning “horsey coupon-cutter”.

Desperate to avoid his creditors, Strepsiades devises a wild plan. He points his son toward a small, odd house across the street called the Phrontisterion—which Meinick wonderfully translates as the “Pondertorium” or “think shop”. Strepsiades explains that the men inside this shop teach both the “superior argument” and the “inferior argument”. If Pheidippides goes and learns the inferior argument, he can use deceptive rhetoric to legally cheat their creditors and cancel all their debts.

Pheidippides flatly refuses, declaring that wild horses could not drag him inside to associate with those barefoot, pasty-looking frauds, and he bolts out the door to seek funding from his wealthy uncle Megacles. Left with no other choice, the elderly Strepsiades decides he must go to the school and learn the rhetorical tricks himself.

Inside the Think Shop: Fleas and Rectumology

When Strepsiades aggressively knocks on the door of the Pondertorium, a student opens it and angrily scolds him for causing the “miscarriage” of a delicate new idea.

The student then eagerly shares the profound, highly absurd “scientific” research currently being conducted by Socrates and his associate, Chaerephon. First, they successfully calculated exactly how many “flea feet” a flea could jump. To measure this, Socrates expertly dipped the flea’s feet into melted wax, let it dry, and pulled off tiny, miniature Persian booties to use as a precise measuring tool.

Strepsiades is utterly amazed by this subtle intellect, but the student has an even greater discovery to share. Socrates recently concluded a study on whether the hum of a gnat is generated through its mouth or its rear end. The great philosopher determined that the gnat’s narrow intestine acts like a compressed channel, forcing wind out of its sphincter to create a vibrating sound. Strepsiades rejoices at this masterful display of “rectumology,” confident that a man who understands the anatomy of a gnat’s rear end can easily help him defeat any lawsuit.

Due to time constraints, the hosts realize they must wrap up Part 1 of this play and save the entrance of the actual Clouds chorus for the next episode.

Sponsors: Fueling the Classical Renaissance

Before escaping the frozen studio, Jeff and Dave thank the generous sponsors who keep the podcast running.

The Gustatory Parting Shot

To close out Episode 208, Dave provides a highly unusual Gustatory Parting Shot from the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations (6:13), using the Gregory Hayes translation:

“How good it is when you have roast meat or such like foods before you to impress on your mind that this is the dead body of a fish. This, the dead body of a bird or pig.”

Dave ponders the stoic lesson embedded within the quote, wondering if it is meant to remind the eater of their own fragile mortality. Jeff pragmatically replies, “Just pass the bacon”.Stay warm, avoid the Pondertorium, and keep taking in the classics. Valete!

Sizing Guide

0